Why I like the Common Core

I like the Common Core Standards.  There.  I said it.

 It seems as though every time I’ve turned around this week there has been a new post condemning the switch of so many states to the Common Core and the fact that it is being pushed through in a highly centralized, top down approach.  While I cannot argue many of the points in the well thought out posts from education bloggers such as Diane Ravitch and Carol Burris, I can see positive changes happening between the walls of our school that will benefit our students due to the Common Core Standards.  Although I would ultimately like our school to do well on standardized tests including the looming PARCC as much as any other principal, that is not ultimately what motivates me or any other educator I know…  The simple test for your Common Core implementation and any effort within your school is, “Is this good for kids?”  In our school, with our students, I would answer “Yes!”

Why I like the Common Core:

  1. Fewer, clearer standards: Although the Common Core is a step in the right direction in focusing the curriculum, teachers must go even further to have a laser like focus on the skills that students need to be successful and guaranteeing that they all learn at high levels.  Some of the best movement I’ve seen in our school this year has been simply reflecting on our priorities and deemphasizing skills that are less important to student success.  It isn’t that these skills are bad in and of themselves.  It is just that we only get our students for so many hours in a day and we must focus our efforts on our highest priorities.  Is learning about money and time bad at the lower levels?  No.  But is it much more important to develop a really solid number sense with numbers 1-10? Yes!  Is teaching cursive writing bad? No.  But is learning to build an argument using examples from the text or setting up a collaborative writing community using a great tool like Kidblog more important?  Absolutely!  This doesn’t mean narrowing our curriculum to what will be solely on the test, it just means focusing our time making sure students master the concepts most critical to their success.  I highly recommend Focus by Mike Schmoker regarding this topic.  It is one of the better reads I’ve encountered in education.
  2. It is changing how we think about curriculum: In our school, like many others, teachers were expected to teach the curriculum from the textbooks as outlined by the publishing companies.  Why do we give the publishing companies this kind of power in our classrooms?!?  Although textbook companies claimed to be “Common Core aligned” about 10 seconds after the standards were released to the public, many educators realize that meeting the demands in the new standards will take more than simply forking over the money for new materials stamped “Common Core aligned.”    Now, as teachers research the best resources to meet the Common Core, we are moving towards a more balanced literacy approach that incorporates lots of great authentic literature in addition to the best of what our basal reading series has to offer.  In math, students are being asked to go beyond simply finding the right answer and deeply investigate concepts in math, finding the most efficient strategies among many.  The curriculum isn’t your textbook.  Teachers must define the curriculum and identify the best resources to meet their goals.
  3. There is an unprecedented opportunity to share ideas: For maybe the first time ever in U.S. education, we will truly have a way to compare “apples to apples.”  Although I don’t buy into the PARCC (or any other high stakes test) being a true measure of the achievement of a school, just think of the power of having a common foundation to work from together.  Imagine a scenario where a teacher in a rural community in the Midwest and one in New York city work collaboratively on a common assessment, teach their students, and then reflect on the results of their teaching together.  Today’s tools make that scenario possible.  Several of our teachers have found an invaluable resource in Teachers Pay Teachers where they can buy or share great ideas for free or at a low cost.  Also, the potential of a community like Mastery Connect and others like it to share common assessments and lesson plans is truly exciting!  Imagine having almost the entire United States as your professional learning community! 

Although opponents of the Common Core bring up many valid concerns that still have my wheels turning, in our school, the Common Core Standards are currently passing the “good for kids” test and I disagree with those who would call it a “passing fad.”  If you get to the core of the issue, is the hesitation of many really the Common Core Standards or how they are being implemented?    Until the electorate shows a desire for politicians who have more ideas regarding education than just “accountability”, high stakes testing will be a part of education in this country regardless of what standards are adopted.  Kelly Gallagher, in his article “The Common Core ate my baby and other urban legends” (worth reading on the title alone) breaks down many of the myths surrounding the Common Core standards.  In many places, implementation seems to have already strayed far from the original intent.  What is your experience of the Common Core?  Does it pass the “good for kids” test in your school?  I would love to hear your thoughts! 

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Why I like the Common Core

  1. franmcveigh

    Very thoughtful post! Thank you! I agree that the benefits outweigh the negatives at this point. Is it possible that “implementation” could derail the Common Core? Of course, it is possible. But should we allow that to happen? The idea of a common set of standards for all kids in the country is empowering. Measuring the learning from those standards will be a whole other “ball of wax” that will melt down and reform multiple times before CCSS implementation is complete. (Fewer standards, a cogent curriculum, and collaborative efforts of teachers are all evidence of the “good or gold” as described by Lucy Calkins!

    My view is posted here http://franmcveigh.wordpress.com/2013/01/30/common-core-a-promise-a-failure/

    Reply
    1. jsagel Post author

      Thanks for sharing your thoughts! I enjoyed getting a chance to read your post as well. I have heard of Lucy Calkins, but haven’t spent a lot of time with her work. I appreciate the recommendation and your encouragement.

      Reply
  2. Joy Kirr (@JoyKirr)

    I like the CCSs, too. I am able to do more close reading with my 7th graders, and fewer lower-level comprehension questions. We have rich discussions, and we take our time figuring out the answers instead of me just giving them the “right” answers. I don’t know about the logistics of money or testing, but I do know we are learning about how to read WELL in our discussions about text this year… Thanks for this post! Don’t be tentative about sharing what you enjoy! (It’s way more refreshing than reading someone’s complaints about something that won’t go away anytime soon…!)

    Reply
    1. jsagel Post author

      Thanks for sharing some thoughts and for the encouragement Joy! It is really cool to hear what you are doing in your classroom. I spent a couple years as a 7th grade English teacher, so it is near and dear to my heart. Although the changes are huge it really does boil down to having better conversations based around reading and writing in our classrooms and deemphasizing or eliminating skills that are disconnected or not as relevant to the needs of our students.

      Reply
  3. terryferickson

    Thank you for sharing your positive thoughts about CCSS. I love the idea of the “good for kids” test and I agree, CCSS is good for all kids. I’m disappointed to read some of the negative feedback coming from some truly articulate, thoughtful, and intelligent people, people whom I more often than not agree with. It seems they are stuck on the who and how of their creation. I am concerned about how the new ELA standards may be implemented by teachers since they are so radically different from NCLB. Sometimes we teachers know just enough to be dangerous! Are you worried about how the CCSS will be implemented? Do you think teachers will have adequate training? Thank you.

    Reply
    1. jsagel Post author

      Thank you for sharing some thoughts Terry! I do worry about implementation because it seems like so many are so focused on doing well on the PARCC rather than what is best for kids. They have changed the rules, but the conversation has generally stayed the same. In regard to training, the thing that is most frequently requested by teachers I know and work with is time. They need time to digest the changes and find the appropriate resources to meet the new challenges and organize and take care of practical needs. How is implementation going in your local area?

      Reply
  4. Pingback: Your problem with the Common Core isn’t really the Common Core | Principal Joey

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s